[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: "Bummer,
From:       Juliana Su <js084 () bucknell ! edu>
Date:       2008-06-26 23:31:22
Message-ID: 486426CA.9020108 () bucknell ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi All,

I just wanted to say thanks for your help. I switched over to another 
modified version of Klingauf's mkrootfs script, which created a much 
simpler RFS than the previous version I was using did, and was able to 
mount it with no issues. I still don't know why the other script had 
issues with /etc/init.d/rcS, but since I got something to mount, that's 
all that matters to me. Thanks again.


-Juliana


Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2008 16:19, Juliana Su wrote:
>   
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick responses. Yes, /etc/init.d/rcS does exist and it 
>> is executable.
>>     
>
> I doubt it is executable at that point. It is a script, right?
> Does its "#!/path/to/interpreter" line point to existing (at that point)
> executable? Can that executable actually be executed (at that point)?
> For example, it might require a library somewhere in /usr/lib,
> and if /usr is not mounted yet....
>
>   
>> I even removed the original rcS and created a new  
>> executable one to do a simple echo and exit, like Hinko suggested, but I 
>> still get the "Bummer" error. At first, I had actually forgotten to set 
>> the execute bit on the new rcS and received a "Bummer, could not run 
>> '/etc/init.d/rcS': Permission denied" error. I fixed that, though, by 
>> doing a chmod 755 on it. By the way, I am using an older version of 
>> BusyBox, version 1.2.1 to be exact.
>>     
>
> How to debug: boot with init=/bin/sh,
> and try to run /etc/init.d/rcS by hand from resulting shell prompt.
> Does it work?
> --
> vda
>
>   
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]