[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: PATCH: New telnetd feature
From:       Mike Frysinger <vapier () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2008-02-28 18:39:35
Message-ID: 200802281339.36191.vapier () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Steven Bradshaw wrote:
> I thought ONESHOT was more descriptive, the timeout being a selectable
> attribute of the ONESHOT mode (but also enabling it).  But calling it
> TIMEOUT is OK too. Should I change the name and resubmit the patch or is
> acceptable as is?

busybox config options generally correspond to an applet option.  in the case 
where they describe behavior, it's more than controlling just an option.  
what you proposed is the former ... you're controlling just 1 option in 
telnetd (which is not named "--oneshot").
-mike

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]