[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: busybox
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ignore touch -f flag
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail ! com>
Date: 2007-11-28 19:18:51
Message-ID: 200711281118.51068.vda.linux () googlemail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 06:55, Tobias Poschwatta wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > touch -f is not part of SUSv3, so should depend on some TOUCH_GNU_COMPAT
> > toggle, imho.
>
> -f has a meaning on BSD:
> Attempt to force the update, even if the file permissions do not
> currently permit it.
> (http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=touch§ion=ANY)
>
> GNU coreutils ignore -f, too. Wouldn't this make it TOUCH_BSD_COMPAT?
Come on guys, it's 5 bytes or so. No need to have an option for that.
--
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic