[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: RFC: remove lash?
From:       "Denis Vlasenko" <vda.linux () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2007-05-24 12:08:43
Message-ID: 1158166a0705240508r4cbbe065o1526c1c166ea34fb () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 5/23/07, Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
> >wasn't rob working on a new shell?  did he make it available
> >anywhere?  i only ask because it might be at least as capable as
> >lash at this point.
>
> see shells/bbsh.c
>
> Will need an indent and could use the patch that i sent to the list ages
> ago to make it a bit smaller and fix a glitch or two.
>
> Ideally, hush should be tweaked to allow for just the very, very basic
> duty of a shell, with if/else, case, etc being config options, at least
> from my POV. Once this is done, rm bbsh and lash, i suppose.

hush in current svn: if/else is already configurable, case is not supported.
--
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]