[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: First impressions of  the "getopt.h forrest"
From:       Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2007-03-28 21:25:16
Message-ID: 200703282325.16396.vda.linux () googlemail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Mats,

On Wednesday 28 March 2007 21:25, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> tis 2007-03-27 klockan 23:26 +0200 skrev Denis Vlasenko:
> > To me it looks like bbox with CONFIG_GETOPT_LONG=n and without
> > run_parts, dumpleases, getopt is already can be compiled with
> > susv3 getopt.
> 
> Today I have rewritten run_parts.c and dumpleases.c to use getopt32,
> and both compile with the standard setting of Eriksen's buildroot
> and Busybox 1.5.0. I also successfully tested run-parts in all
> conceivable ways.

Wow, thanks! I've already commented on run_parts and probably going
to apply the result to svn now... can we see dumpleases.c
conversion? ;)

--
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]