[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: waiting for reply; timeout? [was: "i'll think about it"]
From:       Rob Landley <rob () landley ! net>
Date:       2006-09-25 7:01:50
Message-ID: 200609250301.51110.rob () landley ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 24 September 2006 6:25 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> What happened to "df -t", out of curiousity?
> http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2005-August/015497.html

I've just spent an hour or so on this and I'm kind of curious too.  The df -t 
from SUSv3 and the df -t from gnu aren't on speaking terms, they do 
completely different things.

In the gnu df, "-t" limits the listing to filesystems of a given type, and in 
SUSv3 it's "Include total allocated-space figures in the output".  Of course 
in SUSv3 it's an XSI extension (which also insists that df should list the 
number inodes), so I suspect the answer is "screw the spec, we're modeling 
the gnu behavior instead"...

Right.  (Also, if the same block device shows up in multiple places, I should 
probably filter it out from the list of totals...)

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]