[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: any value to supporting swap version 0 and *really* old kernels?
From:       "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday () mindspring ! com>
Date:       2006-03-30 11:02:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0603300600190.3898 () localhost ! localdomain
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Rob Landley wrote:

> We need a "deprecated" menu...

in any event, i think the people have spoken and want to retain swap
V0 support, which is fine.  the only point i want to close on is that
there are two reasons to retain support for a feature:

1) it actually has value, or
2) it's not hurting anything so just leave it be

i just don't want people making arguments where they're confusing
those two.

onward.

rday
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]