[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: modutils and 2.4 kernel broken?
From:       Rob Landley <rob () landley ! net>
Date:       2005-12-20 19:55:13
Message-ID: 200512201355.14020.rob () landley ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 20 December 2005 03:10, yan seiner wrote:
> This seems to conflict with the docs for building glibc that I read over
> the weekend.... Not that I am an expert - it took me all weekend to get
> a working toolset - but ISTR the docs saying that you should use the
> most recent kernel headers you can; I used 2.6.14 and that seemed to
> work....  I'd be interested in finding some docs for building glibc/gcc....

I've done this before, and plan to write up a HOWTO on building a 
gcc-for-uClibc toolchain if I ever get a spare moment.

Somebody should poke Mazur and see how he's getting along with the cleaned up 
2.6.15 headers...

> --Yan

Rob
-- 
Steve Ballmer: Innovation!  Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]