[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: [BusyBox] udchpc lock-up
From:       Jan Lana <jan.lana () Sun ! COM>
Date:       2004-09-22 7:30:07
Message-ID: 20040922073007.GL26464 () orion ! czech ! sun ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Keath,

the patch doesn't solve the issue. It just detects it and write a error message
to stdout. I'm sure the problem isn't 2.6 specific but you have different 2.4
and 2.6 kernel configuration - you have to compile in or insmod 'unix' (unix
sockets).

Regards,
Jenda

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 07:55:30AM -0500, Keath Milligan wrote:
> Thanks, Jenda, I did apply your patch and that wasn't the problem. Unix 
> sockets were enabled.
> 
> It turns out that this is an issue with the 2.6 kernel. I went back to a 
> 2.4 kernel with pretty much the same config and it worked.
> 
> 
> 
> Jan Lana wrote:
> 
> >You need the unix socket too. udhcpc use unix socket in signal handler.
> >
> >I submit a patch yesterday to the list - the signal handler expects that 
> >the
> >unix socket can be created everytime and doesn't test the socket() return 
> >code.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Jenda
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:04:34AM -0500, Keath Milligan wrote:
> > 
> >
> >>I made sure packet sockets are enabled in the kernel and I've turned on 
> >>debugging in udhcpc - I see "Waiting on select" printed every couple of 
> >>seconds until I hit ctrl-c.
> >>
> >>I can set eth0 to static and it works. I'm using the 2.6 kernel from 
> >>linux-mips.org.
> >>   
> >>
> 
> -- 
> Keath Milligan
> Austin, Texas
> http://keathmilligan.net - News, Tech, Politics, Software
> 

> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox@mail.busybox.net
> http://codepoet.org/mailman/listinfo/busybox



_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@mail.busybox.net
http://codepoet.org/mailman/listinfo/busybox


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]