[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: [BusyBox] shell differences
From:       Peter Willis <psyphreak () phreaker ! net>
Date:       2004-01-29 16:08:41
Message-ID: 20040129110841.52caa4e2 () meatwad
[Download RAW message or body]

have you checked out the test scripts in the tests/ directory? maybe you
could update them with pieces from your scripts if they're lacking some
kind of syntax test...

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:17:03 -0500
Paul Fox <pgf@brightstareng.com> wrote:

>  
> is there a doc anywhere that describes which bash syntax and
> semantic features are _not_ implemented, or implemented
> differently, in ash?
> 
> when porting an existing set of scripts to a busybox system, the
> testing can be a bit of a crapshoot -- it would be nice to be
> able to scan the scripts for known problem areas...
> 
> paul
> =---------------------
>  paul fox, pgf@brightstareng.com
> 


-- 

'Twas midnight, and the UNIX hacks
Did gyre and gimble in their cave
All mimsy was the CS-VAX
And Cory raths outgrabe.
 
"Beware the software rot, my son!
The faults that bite, the jobs that thrash!
Beware the broken pipe, and shun
The frumious system crash!"


_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@mail.busybox.net
http://codepoet.org/mailman/listinfo/busybox


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]