[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    [BusyBox] bug#1067: BusyBox] bug#1067: Not busybox's fault
From:       "David Douthitt" <ssrat () mailbag ! com>
Date:       2000-10-23 21:52:06
[Download RAW message or body]

On 23 Oct 2000, at 13:36, Erik Andersen wrote:

> On Mon Oct 23, 2000 at 02:06:50PM -0500, David Douthitt wrote:
> > I tried busybox from CVS with the insmod from 0.47; same result.  I 
> > tried insmod from Debian 2.1; same result.  Then I got strace, and 
> > ran it.  The same result (basically) on "busybox insmod tulip.o", 
> > "busybox insmod eepro100.o", and "insmod tulip.o".
> 
> BTW,  What libc are you using?

This innocent little question ("BTW" :) sent me down a very fruitful 
journey.  I replaced the "bugfix" libc-2.0.7.so with a copy of the 
default Debian 2.1 Slink installed libc-2.0.7.so, and the problem 
seems to have gone away.  busybox insmod worked; so did strip.

I wonder what happened?  I'll probably try a new copy of the security 
fix release, and see what happens.

-- 
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
ddouthitt@mennonite.minister.net




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]