[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: [BusyBox] Could proc be a kernel module?
From:       Pavel Roskin <proski () gnu ! org>
Date:       2000-07-20 14:11:52
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello!

> The code for proc_foofs() should be in a seperate module that is only
> loaded when both procfs and foofs are loaded.

Ideally - yes. Practically - probably no. I don't like adding complexity
to save 200 bytes in memory.

> What is the problem with using "glue" modules, wouldnt they be a better
> solution than either ifdef or better linking.

In the context of the boot disk (the original past was about it) the
"glue" modules are not needed.

Pavel




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]