[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bugtraq
Subject:    Page table protection on Intel
From:       Jason Spence <thalakan () TECHNOLOGIST ! COM>
Date:       1999-11-26 22:08:25
[Download RAW message or body]

In followup to the discussion about page protection on the
Intel architecture, I got out a copy of the Linux kernel
source and started poking through it.  There's a comment in
include/asm-i386/pgtable.h with all the #defines for the
bit values in the protected mode pages which says that
the x86 can't distinguish between execute and read for pages.
It also says that write permissions imply read permissions.

Looking at it more closely, I don't think that it is
feasable to efficiently do either write-only or
read-but-not-execute in the x86's page table system.
Go get a copy of the latest revision of the Intel
software developer's manual, section 3, and look at page
3-14, which lays out the protection rules for *segments*,
not pages.  There is no execute protection for individual
pages, only write protection.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]