[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bsf-dev
Subject:    Re: BSF 3.0 release?
From:       sebb <sebbaz () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-07-28 8:44:05
Message-ID: 25aac9fc0907280144y4e3e641er9b54605a26d75900 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 27/07/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <Rony.Flatscher@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
>
>  sebb wrote:
>  > Is there any interest in releasing a non-Beta 3.0 version of BSF?
>  >
>  > I'd like to update JMeter to use BSF 3, and would prefer to ship it
>  > with a non-Beta release if possible.
>  >
>  > There don't seem to be any outstanding JIRA bugs for 3.0.
>  >
>  > I found a minor problem with the Main class (throws NPE rather than
>  > reporting that it cannot find a language implementation) which I will
>  > fix shortly.

I found I had already fixed it; but it missed the last release.

There is another problem, which is that the -lang option says it takes
the language as a value; however it actually requires the extension.

I'd like to correct this, and add an option to use the short language
name (e.g. jython).

Ideally I'd like to
rename -lang to -ext and
add -lang to mean shortLanguage

This would only affect the utility main class, but would potentially
break some scripts.

As there has yet to be a formal release, perhaps this does not matter?


>  > I also think it would be useful to add the Main class to the manifest
>  > so one can execute the jar directly.
>  >
>  > Any thoughts?
>  >
>
> Well, I guess it would be o.k. to go for a release as it psychologically
>  might make a differences.
>
>  ---
>
>  Have been waiting on getting somehow access to the JSR-223 TCK. My last
>  attempt a couple of months (sending an e-Mail to the spec lead Mike
>  Grogan) resulted in an e-mail-address error from the Sun mailer to the
>  effect that that e-mail address was unknown. Just tried it again and
>  received:
>
>     This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
>
>       Message-id: <4A6E17AA.2080500@wu-wien.ac.at>
>       Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:10:02 +0200
>       From: "Rony G. Flatscher" <Rony.Flatscher@wu-wien.ac.at>
>       To: Mike.Grogan@sun.com
>       Subject: Ping ...
>
>     Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
>
>       Recipient address: @sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:Mike.Grogan@sun.com
>       Original address: Mike.Grogan@sun.com
>       Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
>       Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.1.1 <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:Mike.Grogan@sun.com>... User unknown
>       Remote system: dns;sunmail5.uk.sun.com (TCP|129.146.11.74|57021|129.156.85.165|25)
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Original-envelope-id: 0KNG00D08LLMIA00@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM
>     Reporting-MTA: dns;nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (tcp-daemon)
>
>     Original-recipient: rfc822;Mike.Grogan@sun.com
>     Final-recipient: rfc822;@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:Mike.Grogan@sun.com
>     Action: failed
>     Status: 5.1.1 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address)
>     Remote-MTA: dns;sunmail5.uk.sun.com (TCP|129.146.11.74|57021|129.156.85.165|25)
>     Diagnostic-code: smtp;550 5.1.1
>      <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:Mike.Grogan@sun.com>... User unknown
>
>
>  Not sure, whether this is a relaying error or not.
>
>  Anyway, in March I posted on the ASF jcp list another request to Geir
>  w.r.t. JSR-223 therefore (and cc'ed it to this list), but that has not
>  brought up news so far either.

That's a pity.

But if we do eventually get the TCK, we could release 3.0.1 or 3.1
after testing.

>  ---
>
>  So again, whatever you think serves the purpose best, it has my +1.
>
>  HTH,
>
>
>  ---rony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]