[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bricolage-devel
Subject:    Re: 1.10.4 imminent
From:       Phillip Smith <phillip () communitybandwidth ! ca>
Date:       2008-01-21 17:54:06
Message-ID: 16ED8412-F1A1-4956-BC26-D607598CD249 () communitybandwidth ! ca
[Download RAW message or body]


On Dec 23, 2007, at 6:13 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:

> On Dec 23, 2007, at 13:47, Phillip Smith wrote:
>
>> On 20-Dec-07, at 10:29 AM, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
>>
>>> We use very long category paths and many of them. They are very
>>> difficult to select in the UI on different places due to the fixed
>>> width and length of list boxes. I fixed two situations to just  
>>> use the
>>> size needed for the content.
>>
>> Related to this, and following up on this bug (Funny layout in the  
>> UI on long related media paths)
>> http://bugs.bricolage.cc/show_bug.cgi?id=1293
>>
>> ... and given the generally acknowledged increases in screen  
>> resolution; I'm wondering if it's time to think about increasing  
>> the width of the browser window that is opened when logging into  
>> Bricolage? Seems that might help with some of the funny UI issues  
>> with long category paths, etc.
>
> I think that Marshall improved some of this stuff in trunk, no?
>
> Best,
>
> David



Hi ho,

I tried out the trunk code (thanks to Bret) and, as far as I can  
tell, the Bricolage default window size is not any bigger. I almost  
wonder if we should consider increasing the size of the UI window  
that is opened from the initial log-in screen (perhaps the newer  
convention of 950px wide for a 1024 x 768 screen resolution...?).

Also, as I review the changes in trunk, should I just be posting  
commentary to RT, or here to the dev list too?

Phillip.

--
Phillip Smith,
Simplifier of Technology
Community Bandwidth
http://www.communitybandwidth.ca


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]