[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bricolage-devel
Subject:    Re: [Bricolage-Devel] terms of contention: Model, Type, and Asset
From:       David Wheeler <david () kineticode ! com>
Date:       2003-05-20 15:14:23
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 07:44  AM, Mark Jaroski wrote:

> Then how about Type::TopLevel ?  That's pretty descriptive.

Top level what would be the question. Class names should generally be 
nouns.

> OK, I agree with you that's it's probably fine to use Type
> in the UI and Type::Model in the API.  Which was in fact
> what you proposed and I started designing around before Sara
> pointed out that she liked Type better for documents.
>
> So yeah, let's use Bric::Type::Model, and call it Model in
> the UI.

Fine.

David

-- 
David Wheeler                                     AIM: dwTheory
david@kineticode.com                              ICQ: 15726394
http://kineticode.com/                         Yahoo!: dew7e
                                                Jabber: Theory@jabber.org
Kineticode. Setting knowledge in motion.[sm]



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Bricolage-Devel mailing list
Bricolage-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bricolage-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]