[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       botan-devel
Subject:    [Botan-devel] Botan library with Netsieben core dump
From:       garg_neetu () yahoo ! com (Neetu Garg)
Date:       2009-10-27 21:55:18
Message-ID: 115920.88178.qm () web36501 ! mail ! mud ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Andrew Useckas from  Netsieben  is helping me on this issue. I pointed him to this \
thread and here is his reply:

Regards,

Neetu.


Neetu,

Yes, the discussion makes sense. I can integrate Jack's patch into the latest \
version. You have a newer, unreleased version as he is working against earlier \
version available from the website.

I will try to get this done tomorrow.

Regards,
Andrew




----- Original Message ----
From: Neetu Garg <garg_neetu at yahoo.com>
To: Botan development list <botan-devel at randombit.net>
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 1:57:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Botan-devel] Botan library with Netsieben core dump

I am using "ne7ssh-1.3.2rc2" in my code. But when I saw your patch is for \
"ne7ssh-1.3.1" so I had that version and I applied it "ne7ssh-1.3.1" only.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,

Neetu.



----- Original Message ----
From: Neetu Garg <garg_neetu at yahoo.com>
To: Botan development list <botan-devel at randombit.net>
Sent: Mon, October 26, 2009 10:49:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Botan-devel] Botan library with Netsieben core dump

Hello Jack,

Please find the ".rej" file attached.

Regards,
NG



----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lloyd <lloyd at randombit.net>
To: Botan development list <botan-devel at randombit.net>
Sent: Mon, October 26, 2009 10:43:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Botan-devel] Botan library with Netsieben core dump

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:21:29PM -0700, Neetu Garg wrote:
> Thanks Jack,
> 
> I tried to apply the patch but it resulted in some errors:
> 
> Please let me know if I am doing anything wrong here.

I'm not sure. Perhaps your patch program is confused by the leading
lines from emacs (those starting with ;;)?

I see 'Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 1.', so patch clearly
managed to find some of the sources.

Which version are you using? It's possible/probable that older
versions will have a sufficient number of changes that patch won't be
able to apply the diffs cleanly.

What do the rejections (.rej files) look like?

-Jack
_______________________________________________
botan-devel mailing list
botan-devel at randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/botan-devel


      
_______________________________________________
botan-devel mailing list
botan-devel at randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/botan-devel



      


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]