[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost-users
Subject:    Re: [Boost-users] boost condition_variable internals
From:       "John M. Dlugosz" <ngnr63q02 () sneakemail ! com>
Date:       2014-01-29 2:47:30
Message-ID: lc9q47$o5b$1 () ger ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 1/24/2014 9:51 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote:
> Ah yeah, I found the source location just a bit after sending that and saw about what
> condition_variable uses internally after I looked at it. I can use locks, but I'm
> restricted to using locks that are from the pin threading api, so any locks that come from
> pthreads or windows are the ones that I have to avoid.
You could add an implementation of the mutex and condition_variable classes that use the 
"pin api", just as it has separate files now for pthreads and Win32.  With the classes now 
being part of the C++ standard, such would be expected for any "api".



_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]