[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost-testing
Subject:    Re: [Boost-testing] Surprising results testing serialization library
From:       Steven Watanabe via Boost-Testing <boost-testing () lists ! boost ! org>
Date:       2017-12-06 15:52:06
Message-ID: 5A281226.8090206 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

AMDG

On 12/06/2017 08:32 AM, Robert Ramey via Boost-Testing wrote:
> I've been watching the develop/master test matrices for the
> serialization library.  It seems that all on 05 December I started to
> get some new test failures.  These are it "test check",test_load_fail,
> test_traits_fail and test_not_serializable.
> 
> A common factor in all these tests are that they are tests which are
> meant to fail and are marked accordingly int the test Jamfile.v2.  That
> is the tests are indeed failing, but instead of showing up as "Passed. I
> don't think its the Jamfile, and in fact it hasn't been altered since 24
> November.  I don't think it's any recent code changes either.  I've
> looked through the code in the serialization library as well as mpl and
> BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT and don't see any issues.  It does look like Boost
> Build has been altered recently but I can't really know for sure.
> 
> Does anyone know anything about this?
> 

  I think it's caused by an accidental change
to the b2 output, that causes process_jam_log
to misinterpret it.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

_______________________________________________
Boost-Testing mailing list
Boost-Testing@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]