'Re: [Boost-testing] Labeling C++0x enabled tests'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost-testing
Subject:    Re: [Boost-testing] Labeling C++0x enabled tests
From:       "K. Noel Belcourt" <kbelco () sandia ! gov>
Date:       2009-09-03 15:45:38
Message-ID: DAB2936A-7C88-4269-A19B-FECE30FC2CCF () sandia ! gov
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

On Sep 3, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:

> Thanks to Noel for appending "_gnu++0x" to the Sandia-gcc test  
> names to indicate that the compiler is running with the option that  
> enables C++0x features. For example, "gcc- 4.4.1_gnu++0x".
>
> I find this really helpful, and hope that other testers will also  
> indicate C++0x features are enabled if the compiler requires a  
> specific option to enable them.
>
> However, could we agree on a shorter naming convention? Screen  
> width is scarce on the regression reporting pages. See http:// 
> beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html
>
> Perhaps just "-0x" as in "gcc- 4.4.1-0x"?

Sure, I'll make the changes.

By the way, I'll begin running the MPI tests for both trunk and  
release now that the reporting is working.  But I'll have to create a  
separate tester for each toolset since the MPI installation is  
toolset specific.

-- Noel

[Attachment #5 (unknown)]

<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; \
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "> <br><div><div>On Sep 3, 2009, at 8:51 AM, \
Beman Dawes wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote \
type="cite">Thanks to Noel for appending "_gnu++0x" to the Sandia-gcc test names to \
indicate that the compiler is running with the option that enables C++0x features. \
For example, "<span class="timestamp-0">gcc- 4.4.1_gnu++0x".<br> <br>I find this \
really helpful, and hope that other testers will also indicate C++0x features are \
enabled if the compiler requires a specific option to enable them.<br><br>However, \
could we agree on a shorter naming convention? Screen width is scarce on the \
regression reporting pages. See <a \
href="http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html">http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html</a><br> \
<br>Perhaps just "-0x" as in "</span><span class="timestamp-0">gcc- \
4.4.1-0x</span><span \
class="timestamp-0">"?<br></span></blockquote></div><br><div>Sure, I'll make the \
changes.</div><div><br></div><div>By the way, I'll begin running the MPI tests for \
both trunk and release now that the reporting is working. &nbsp;But I'll have to \
create a separate tester for each toolset since the MPI installation is toolset \
specific.</div><div><br></div><div>-- Noel</div><div><br></div></body></html>

_______________________________________________
Boost-Testing mailing list
Boost-Testing@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 