[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost
Subject:    [boost] [preprocessor] Testing C++ standard macro examples
From:       Edward Diener via Boost <boost () lists ! boost ! org>
Date:       2019-11-14 20:34:21
Message-ID: qqkdoe$73hk$1 () blaine ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

I have added to the 'develop' branch of Boost PP an 'explicit' test with 
the alias of 'test_iso' in the 'test' subdirectory. This test, depending 
on the compiler toolset and C++ standard setting used, will test a 
compiler's ability to expand correctly the macros listed in a C++ 
standard document's "Macro Replacement" section for C++ standards 2003, 
2001, 2014, 2017, and 2020 ( N4835 ).

The test uses the __cplusplus setting and the Boost PP 
BOOST_PP_VARIADICS setting to determine which C++ standard's set of 
macros to test. This is because the __cplusplus setting alone is 
misleading for a number of compilers, most notably vc++ and compilers 
who mimic vc++, who do not set the correct __cplusplus setting for the 
C++ standard level being used.

There are really only three sets of macros from the C++ standard 
documents which can potentially be tested, despite five different 
standards being considered. This is because the set of macros to be 
tested for C++11, C++14, and C++17 are exactly the same.

Some compilers do allow C++20 support but do not implement the full 
__VA_OPT__ support yet, so these compilers will fail the C++20 macro 
tests with compiler errors. Among these are gcc and vc++, who both 
document that they do not yet support the stringizing operator with the 
__VA_OPT__ parameter. Clang also supports C++20 and will run the test 
and succeed in that mode. You can of course test any compiler at any C++ 
level and view the results.

These tests, unlike Boost PP, do not have any workarounds for any 
compilers. So the tests form a really good basis for reporting macro 
expansion preprocessor bugs to various compiler implementations.

In the 'test' subdirectory of Boost PP you should be able to run:

b2 toolset=atoolset cxxstd=astandard( optional ) test_iso

to get the results for any compiler.

Any failed results will show the test output, where the original 
expression, the expanded expression, and for individual failed tests the 
expected expanded expression will be shown. The actual macros being used 
are in the appropriate C++ Standard documents or can be seen in the test 
program which is called cpp_standard.cpp in the same 'test' subdirectory.

After the upcoming release I will push this to the 'master' branch. 
Please note that the test is an 'explicit' test so it is not normally 
run when you just run the tests for Boost PP.



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]