[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost
Subject:    Re: [boost] Late fix for Boost PP
From:       Edward Diener via Boost <boost () lists ! boost ! org>
Date:       2019-11-12 20:07:42
Message-ID: qqf3ed$3t84$1 () blaine ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/12/2019 11:32 AM, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:
> I had added support in the Boost PP library in C20 mode ( __cplusplus > 
> 201703L ) for the __VA_OPT__ construct and enhanced an internal function 
> used fairly extensively in the library to use this functionality in c20 
> mode when __VA_OPT__ was supported. I had tested this against the 
> compilers which I knew could operate in c20 mode, gcc and clang, and all 
> was well. I just discovered that the vc++ compiler can also work in c20 
> mode in Boost PP as defined above if you pass the '/std:c++latest' and 
> the '/Zc:__cplusplus' command line switches and that vc++, in its usual 
> non-standard way, blows up badly when doing so using the preprocessor 
> library because it can not handle the rather simple code that checks for 
> __VA_OPT__ support in c20 mode.
> 
> I have a simple fix for this which is to turn off the __VA_OPT__ support 
> and __VA_OPT__ support checking in c20 mode specifically for vc++ and 
> removes which I have pushed to 'develop'. Can I push this fix to the 
> 'master' branch now ? The fix needs to get in the coming release or else 
> vc++ programmers specifying both the '/std:c++latest' and the 
> '/Zc:__cplusplus' command line switched will not be able to use Boost PP 
> and the many libraries which use Boost PP in the upcoming release.
> 
> I apologize for the seeming aggressiveness of this change, which 
> incorporated the c20 __VA_OPT__ support internally in some much-used 
> Boost PP functionality when c20 mode is being used, but I did not 
> anticipate that it would blow up on me, although maybe I should have. I 
> can also remove that internal dependency with a very simple one-line 
> change. I realize that Boost PP stability has to be maintained, even in 
> c20 mode for the few compilers which support that mode and apologize 
> again that I have endangered it there.

I pushed a fix to the 'master' branch to get vc++ in c20 mode to work 
correctly. I am 100% sure that this is safe.


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]