On 08/20/2014 05:18 AM, Gavin Lambert wrote: > On 20/08/2014 02:53, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> Thanks for writing this down in detail! It's indeed a matter of >> preference, although: >> >> - For Boost.Build specifically, I prefer to avoid merge commits as much >> as possible. >> - In most cases of a single commit, or a few unrelated commits, using >> "git pull" and >> creating merge commits results in rather noisy and unclear history. >> I'd imagine >> maintainers of other components might prefer to avoid that - although >> it's up to them, >> of course. > > One case where it's a bit trickier to define the "right thing" is with pull requests. > > The simplest thing to do (especially if you're using the GitHub UI) is to simply merge the pull request directly. Obviously this does > create a merge commit and you'll see a fork in the revision graph as in my first diagram. > > Often the pull request is created in isolation (especially if the user was using the GitHub editing UI directly) and so the maintainer could > reasonably safely do a rebased or squashed pull on this branch to keep the core history "clean". This can be especially tempting if there > were multiple commits to the PR branch during its lifetime to correct various issues raised by the maintainer -- then a squashed merge would > produce a single "pristine" commit without all of the fumbling. Yep, I normally merge pull requests by hand, using "git fetch" + "git cherry-pick" of FETCH_HEAD - optionally squashing. > The downside of the latter is that the history will no longer show which PR branch it came from (that's the part you're cleaning) -- and if > the user didn't create it as a throwaway but is using it in one of their own branches (which is likely if they're using git themselves for > their own software) then the former will just work nicely for them while the latter will create a conflict that forces them to rebase > anything built on top of it. You are correct. Was not a problem in practice for me though - the branches being pull-requested had temporary-sounding names. - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost