[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost
Subject:    Re: [boost] Showstopper for Boost 1.56?
From:       "Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge () nedprod ! com>
Date:       2014-08-03 20:45:32
Message-ID: 53DE9F6C.24354.14722D47 () s_sourceforge ! nedprod ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On 3 Aug 2014 at 13:35, Eric Niebler wrote:

> > The problem with changing the jam files is that end-users will also get
> > the change where <warnings>all does not specify '-pedantic' where they
> > might really want it to.
> 
> Since nobody has made a definite suggestion or submitted a patch, this
> issue will in all likelihood not be fixed for 1.56. Sorry, guys.

No one seemed to want a consensus. And I don't have privs to enforce 
a fix across Boost, or I would have.

I can't wait for the clang folk to realise that Boost 1.56 outputs 
many megabytes of warning spew on clang. I hope it goes viral on G+.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/



["SMime.p7s" (application/x-pkcs7-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]