[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost
Subject:    Re: [boost] Showstopper for Boost 1.56?
From:       "Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge () nedprod ! com>
Date:       2014-07-30 13:21:14
Message-ID: 53D8F14A.11787.556C59E9 () s_sourceforge ! nedprod ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On 30 Jul 2014 at 8:23, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> > That's great news, now we know the cause of the spew!
> >
> > This is definitely a showstopper for Boost 1.56, megabytes of warning
> > spew on clang would be embarrassing for an official release. Bug is
> > filed at:
> >
> > https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/10276
> 
> I suppose this is unfortunate all round - in particular using -Wno-c99-extensions is way
> wider than the warning we're trying to suppress here.
> 
> In either case, for a simple change like this, a pull request might be better than
> an issue.

An alternative could be if Edward wraps the appropriate parts of 
Preprocessor with:

#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wc99-extensions"

iff building with clang.

I believe clang supports these pragma filters.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/



["SMime.p7s" (application/x-pkcs7-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]