[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: boost
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen () dezide ! com>
Date: 2012-10-31 16:58:35
Message-ID: 509158BB.6010208 () dezide ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 29-10-2012 11:50, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> That seems like a lot of nice improvements. However, there is one thing
> that could save a lot of time for us, and that's the ability to
> run a specific test as the first one.
>
> Is that hard to add?
>
Another issue. It would be cool to be able to give access to private
members in the unit test. So given
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( testMyClass )
{
...
}
I would be able to test private functions with:
class MyClass
{
friend void boost::test::testMyClass();
// or
friend class boost::test::access;
};
or something.
Would this be possible?
kind regards
-Thorsten
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic