[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: boost
Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] Proposal. Determining interest.
From: Vladimir.Batov () wrsa ! com ! au
Date: 2007-10-31 20:52:42
Message-ID: OF2B9EBDA1.EA1958BB-ONCA257385.00728743-CA257385.0072AA6C () wrsl ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
> I've downloaded it, read the documentation, and I think it looks
promising.
>
> To test it out I'm converting a pimpled class in my code base to use
> your library. This class is noncopyable and as such it isn't immediately
> obvious to me whether the class should be modeled using the pimpl's
> value semantics, pointer semantics, or some other semantic that doesn't
> yet exist.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael Marcin
Achieving non-copyability seems as straightforward as
struct Foo : public pimpl<Foo>::pointer_semantics, boost::noncopyable
{
};
Thanks,
Vladimir.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic