[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost
Subject:    Re: [boost] [1.34.0beta] many, many warnings... :(
From:       David Abrahams <dave () boost-consulting ! com>
Date:       2007-05-05 0:37:05
Message-ID: 87odl085se.fsf () valverde ! peloton
[Download RAW message or body]


on Wed May 02 2007, Jody Hagins <jody-boost-011304-AT-atdesk.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:59:56 -0700
> "Sohail Somani" <s.somani@fincad.com> wrote:
>
>
>> But most (not all, for sure) warnings can be disabled by
>> -fno-some-feature. The only places where you might have to change the
>> code would be in the cases where the warning cannot be disabled. 
>
>
> That's the problem.  You don't want to disable the warning entirely. 
> That's worse than ignoring them.  You want to disable a warning at the
> point it is a warning.

I.e. in the code, not on the compiler command line.

> This is a MAJOR drawback of gcc...

Yup.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]