[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost
Subject:    Re: [boost] [1.34.0beta] many, many warnings... :(
From:       Nicola Musatti <Nicola.Musatti () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-05-02 21:40:57
Message-ID: f1b0hb$1sc$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Sohail Somani wrote:
[...]
> It sounds like gcc/msvc are the ones people would be most happy with. By
> turnaround, do you mean them actually running? I don't see why it
> wouldn't be possible for a subset of configurations.

Considering the 1.34 regression tests, which only cover officially 
supported platforms, between gcc and msvc there are 16 variants. You may 
decide to cover only a subset, but you must test all the others to 
ensure you didn't break anything. I wish I could afford to run so many 
regression tests each night.

I still think that a revived bug traking tool, where people who care 
post warning clearing patches, is more viable.

Cheers,
Nicola Musatti


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]