[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       boost
Subject:    Re: [boost] [Random] GCC 2.95.3 regressions
From:       Michael Stevens <Michael.Stevens () epost ! de>
Date:       2004-09-30 19:14:34
Message-ID: 200409302114.34177.Michael.Stevens () epost ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

> Aleksey Gurtovoy writes:
> > 
> > Given that the code compiles with the latests versions of the
> > compiler, the following (from http://tinyurl.com/58lll) is most likely
> > to be a compiler bug, but since the test used to pass some time ago, I
> > was wondering if anyone is interested in making it work again or simply
> > commenting on it before I mark it green:
> 
> [snip errors]
> 
> OK, seems like nobody is interested in these, marked up as expected.
I took a quick look. It seems like gcc-2.95 has namespace problems when 
BOOST_USING_STD_MIN/MAX
Since Random never worked on systems without min/max in std I have simplified 
and use std::min/max instead. This fixes gcc-2.95 and should not regress on 
any of the good compilers.

If this looks good in the tests tomorrow I will remove the failure markup.

Michael

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]