[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: bitkeeper-users
Subject: Re: [Bitkeeper-users] Best repository structure for zig-zagging lines of development?
From: Greg KH <greg () kroah ! com>
Date: 2002-03-14 7:07:56
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:08:08PM -0500, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
>
> What is the best way to represent this in a repository structure, with
> local additions added on top? (Since I suspect my current structure of
> repositories is not ideal, I won't bother blathering on about it.)
I tried for a while to keep the -ac tree and the Linus trees together in
one repository during the mid 2.4.x time frame and quickly gave up :)
It's easier to just keep separate repositories, and send the different
people your different patches. It's pretty easy to export a patch from
one repository and import it into another.
At least that's how I ended up doing stuff, but others might have
different opinions :)
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Bitkeeper-users mailing list
Bitkeeper-users@bitmover.com
http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic