[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bitcoin-dev
Subject:    Re: [bitcoin-dev] Playing with full-rbf peers for fun and L2s security
From:       Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev () lists ! linuxfoundation ! org>
Date:       2022-06-27 13:46:46
Message-ID: 0C7738AD-E9C2-4A21-9B4C-64CB8100FC47 () petertodd ! org
[Download RAW message or body]



On June 27, 2022 8:03:38 AM EDT, Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com> wrote:
> One key difference seems to be that properly punishing someone based on
> mempool behavior seems much more difficult. As we all know there is no "the
> mempool".

No, that's not relevant here: the DoS condition is the existence of a (mined) double \
spend for a given txout used in a coin join. That condition is entirely under the \
control of the wallet, and can be totally avoided by the wallet regardless of mempool \
behavior. _______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]