[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bitcoin-dev
Subject:    [bitcoin-dev] Refund Excesss Fee Hard Fork Proposal
From:       praxeology_guy () protonmail ! com (praxeology_guy)
Date:       2017-03-31 21:17:16
Message-ID: rrMTVqlEe7A5uHTOaUIuIlQ17uo9BOswBiDDtG_73l3hWbTyWHDxZ-3oSIceyHOddBu83XbQrsEPcTy7A-v75pf6hLeu5pRbO6k7qAuYLS0= () protonmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> That would have the unfortunate effect of incentivizing miners to not completely \
> fill blocks, because low fee marginal transactions could cost them money.

Look at the fee distribution. The vast majority of fee income comes from txs w/ fees \
near the LIFB. The blocks will be full... but I guess this would make Child Pays For \
Parent undesirable. CPFP would need a flag saying it is CPFP so that the parent fee \
                isn't considered the LIFB.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170331/d725ac3f/attachment.html>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]