[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bitcoin-dev
Subject:    [Bitcoin-development] A critique of bitcoin open source community
From:       jtimon () monetize ! io (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?=)
Date:       2013-10-21 10:21:27
Message-ID: CAC1+kJOvrcK5-W9HsBZLPKVxR=iMkR9F8RAhUsrnjpq7E3vxwQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I think it's great to move BIPs to github.
I also agree with the states -> directories mapping.
Git manages moved files well.


On 10/21/13, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman at me.com> wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-21, at 2:44 AM, Arto Bendiken <arto at bendiken.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Indeed. The BIP analogs that immediately come to mind would be the
>> enhancement proposal processes for Python, XMPP, and BitTorrent:
>
> Bitcoin's BIP process is directly based off of Python's PEP process.
>
> Quote from BIP 1, History:
>
> This document was derived heavily from Python's PEP-0001. In many places
> text was simply copied and modified.
>


-- 
Jorge Tim?n

http://freico.in/



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]