[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bird-users
Subject:    Re: Template sans "channels"
From:       Ondrej Zajicek <santiago () crfreenet ! org>
Date:       2020-01-09 17:03:18
Message-ID: 20200109170318.GN2475 () feanor ! crfreenet ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 03:20:23PM +0100, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> Ahoj (again) :-)
> 
> While in the process of cleaning up "ancient" configs (basically rewriting them \
> from scratch) I came across an odd discovery: 
> A template definition (for a kernel protocol) demands the specification of one (and \
> only one) channel - which, in my case, defeats the whole purpose of having a kernel \
> template in the first place.
...
> What is the intention behind this? I do understand, that -in the end- the actual \
> protocol defined through a template must have one (and only one in the case of a \
> "kernel" protocol) channel definition and in my example this requirement would be \
> fulfilled.

Hello

Seems like a bug. Will check that.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]