[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bioc-devel
Subject:    Re: [Bioc-devel] [Boostheaders-devel]  Boost packaged on rforge
From:       Vincent Carey <stvjc () channing ! harvard ! edu>
Date:       2015-01-04 16:35:02
Message-ID: CAANT7+UMRwdOrOsvgRLu9cxdQQtSt-GBiQ2ics3-S_Gko5EdkA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Clearly I dropped the ball on this.  Is the iterative approach to
discovering and
specifying the additional headers, given by Steffen Neumann on 5/2/13,
still valid?

I would like to use BH if possible for maintaining RBGL.   However I won't
be able
to get involved until March at the earliest.

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> wrote:

>
> This picks up an old thread from 2013 about Boost.Graph and BH in which
> Vince
> et al offered to look into what it would take to add Graph to BH.
>
> I now have a use case for Boost Graph, so I'll add it to BH -- but without
> the ability to do parsing as we are header-only in BH.
>
> Boost Graph says:
>
>    The Boost Graph Library is a header-only library and does not need to be
>    built to be used. The only exceptions are the GraphViz input parser and
>    the GraphML parser.
>
> Looking at the copy of RBGL 1.28 I have here on my (implicit) CRAN mirror
> (via CRANberries) I see that you bundle an include directory.  So it seems
> I
> can help you there.
>
> Can you confirm that you don't do parsing and do not generally link to
> Boost
> Graph?
>
> I opened an issue ticket here:
>
>   https://github.com/eddelbuettel/bh/issues/9
>
>
> Dirk
>
>
> --
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]