[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       binutils-bugs
Subject:    [Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader
From:       "Marco.Leise at gmx dot de" <sourceware-bugzilla () sourceware ! org>
Date:       2018-05-21 11:56:09
Message-ID: bug-18616-70-KNLLhVLK3G () http ! sourceware ! org/bugzilla/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616

--- Comment #10 from Marco Leise <Marco.Leise at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9)
> Since this is a bug about oprofile, a relevant question is: What version of
> the bfd library is oprofile using?

opreport is linked against libbfd-2.30.0.so and behaves the same when compiled
against libbfd-2.29.1.

(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8)
> objdump -WL <file>
> 
> I doubt if this is the same as oprofile will produce, but both tools
> will be displaying processed DWARF line number information so they
> should be roughly equivalent.

The objdump output looks fine. Does that mean the issue has to be in Oprofile?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]