[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: binutils
Subject: Re: [RFC] Move static archive dependencies into ld
From: Howard Chu <hyc () symas ! com>
Date: 2023-06-05 14:16:29
Message-ID: 4b99cb5f-79a9-0a86-f675-81e4fa77e1b8 () symas ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
What needs to happen to move this RFC forward? There seems to be at least some \
support for the idea (attached)
Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Matz via Binutils wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is an RFC for now. When met with some acceptance I'll cobble up a
> > similar thing for gold as well and then make the libdep.so plugin only
> > emit a warning message that its functionality is obsoleted and moved
> > into ld itself. As Cary put it back in 2020 when the plugin was added:
> >
> > ( https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-December/114536.html )
> >
> > "Did I miss any discussion about whether this feature should/could be
> > implemented directly in the linkers, rather than via a plugin? I
> > wouldn't be opposed to it."
>
> I'm all for it. I went the plugin route initially because it seemed the
> easiest way to get the feature written and accepted but I agree with you,
> it'd be much more useful if it was implicitly supported by default.
> >
> > I pretty much think that yes, the functionality absolutely needs to be in
> > the linker itself, not in a plugin, at least if we want to see some use of
> > it in the real world. Amusingly I was triggered to look into this by
> > libbfd itself: Recently it got a dependency to libsframe and when
> > shipping only static archives to build against (which we as distro
> > consciously do) that leads to build errors in various 3rdparty packages
> > wanting to link against libbfd (no matter how bad an idea that is). Now,
> > adding a '-plugin $magicdir/libdep.so' to the build flags of each such
> > package is no better than just adding '-lsframe' in each case, so the
> > plugin really doesn't help anything. Had the functionality already been
> > in the linker itself we could have just added
> > "--record-libdeps='-lsframe'" when building libbfd.a and be done with it.
> >
> > So, let's try to prepare for the future and at least now make ld interpret
> > such dependencies on its own.
> >
> > So, what do people think?
> >
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Michael.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------
> >
> > needing a plugin to interpret static archive dependencies (as added
> > by 'ar --record-libdeps') effectively means they are unused.
> > Which is too bad, because they are actually useful. So implement
> > them in ld itself.
>
>
>
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
["[PATCH] ld: build libdep plugin only when shared library support is
enabled.eml" (message/rfc822)]
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld: build libdep plugin only when shared library support
is enabled
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Clément_Chigot?= <chigot@adacore.com>,
binutils@sourceware.org
References: <20230413074914.354662-1-chigot@adacore.com>
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Message-ID: <5216d67e-ab2b-8142-edd8-4cab38ee2dc6@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:54:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20230413074914.354662-1-chigot@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Clément Chigot via Binutils wrote:
> Otherwise, libtool will create a static plugin which cannot be loaded.
> Even worse on Windows, it will create a .a file, resulting in a similar
> bug than PR 27113: some tools will try to open it and Windows will raise
> a popup error.
At this point I think it'd be better to integrate the libdep functionality directly \
into ld, as suggested before:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-February/126155.html
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic