[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: binutils
Subject: Re: Help text for ld magic number options
From: Stephen Casner <casner () acm ! org>
Date: 2020-02-24 21:26:32
Message-ID: alpine.OSX.2.21.9999.2002241245020.34795 () auge ! attlocal ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Feb 22 2020, Stephen Casner wrote:
>
> > I propose that the help text be changed as follows:
> >
> > -n, --nmagic Make text readonly, page align data, no demand paging
> > -N, --omagic Do not make text readonly, do not page align data
> > --no-omagic Make text readonly, page align data, do demand paging
> >
> > Is that acceptable? This would have implications for the ld
> > documentation as well.
>
> I think there is some confusion about what "alignment" means in this
> context. Here is what the manpage says:
>
> OMAGIC The text and data segments immediately follow the
> header and are contiguous. The kernel loads both text
> and data segments into writable memory.
>
> NMAGIC As with OMAGIC, text and data segments immediately fol-
> low the header and are contiguous. However, the kernel
> loads the text into read-only memory and loads the data
> into writable memory at the next page boundary after
> the text.
>
> ZMAGIC The kernel loads individual pages on demand from the
> binary. The header, text segment and data segment are
> all padded by the link editor to a multiple of the page
> size. Pages that the kernel loads from the text seg-
> ment are read-only, while pages from the data segment
> are writable.
>
> The alignment appears to refer to the padding added by the link editor
> in the ZMAGIC format.
Thanks for that clarification. I think "padding" would be the more
operative word than "alignment" here, noting that the latter word does
not appear in the cited paragraphs.
How about:
-n, --nmagic Text in readonly pages, not padded for demand paging
-N, --omagic Do not make text readonly, do not page align data
--no-omagic Make text readonly, align and pad for demand paging
In both my original proposal and this one, the --no-omagic description
is inaccurate for the pdp11-aout format because padding to page
boundaries is never done, but there isn't a way to omit the common
options for some emulations.
-- Steve
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic