[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: binutils
Subject: Re: changes in 'intl'
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow () false ! org>
Date: 2006-06-26 13:10:49
Message-ID: 20060626131049.GA28405 () nevyn ! them ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:33:12PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:33:02AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Index: binutils/ChangeLog
> > 2006-05-31 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * Makefile.am: Replace INTLLIBS with LIBINTL everywhere. Add
> > DEPENDENCIES variables for every program.
>
> This results in libbfd, libopcodes, and libiberty dependencies being
> omitted. If you specify *_DEPENDENCIES variables, they need to list
> *all* dependencies. A similar problem occurs if you try to add empty
> rules for the exe files like
> addr2line$(EXEEXT): $(LIBINTL_DEP)
> ar$(EXEEXT): $(LIBINTL_DEP)
> ..
> Automake then decides not to add its own rules. :-(
>
> This patch isn't very nice, but I'm not inclined to delve into automake
> to find a more elegant solution.
Oh, that's where this patch went - sorry, it got dropped into my rda@
folder.
Aside from the @LEXLIB@ problem which I fixed the next day, this is
about the best we can do. There's no user hook to perform the LDADD ->
DEPENDENCIES conversion, unfortunately.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic