[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bind9-users
Subject:    Re: rfc1035.com mail exchanger (was Re: Most current info on DNSSEC?)
From:       Kevin <bind () gnosys ! biz>
Date:       2004-06-02 21:28:19
Message-ID: 200406021728.19335.bind () gnosys ! biz
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 02 June 2004 17:16, Seth Roth wrote:
> You all need to stick to purposeful text.

Sorry, but are these questions off-topic for this list?  DNSSEC and 
testing and so forth?  If so, is there a list where they are on-topic?

> On Wednesday 02 June 2004 15:14, Kevin wrote:
> > If I understood your reply to me then everything that I've been
> > reading in the dnssec draft documents _is_ implemented in
> > bind9.3.0beta4. Is that right?
> >
> >
> > So I guess I could set myself up as
> > an "island of security" (from the intro draft) and fool around with
> > it a bit?
> >
> >
> >
> > The new records shouldn't cause problems for the
> > non-security-aware resolvers and name servers should they?
> >
> >
> >
> > Are
> > people doing that now (islands of security)?
> >
> >
> >
> > Is that what you meant by testbeds (islands of security)?
> > were you talking about key signing keys by some TLDs that are
> > helping to test the dnssec code? =C2=A0Just curious.
> >
> >
> >
> > If the latter (ZSK, KSK, TLDs, etc.), do
> > you know of any way for me to participate in any of those testbeds?
> >
> >
> >
> > Would someone involved in those testbeds be pleased or
> > irritated by the notion of having another domain owner get involved
> > in the testing?

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]