[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bind-workers
Subject:    Re: BIND9 and export libraries
From:       Ambarisha B <b.ambarisha () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-07-23 5:24:18
Message-ID: CAJP25sNXVQY+RGrZq9FwKueXeT1JApOSE2_WM8kVW0EWOM6nUw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks for the clarification

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote:
>> What are the differences between BIND9 libraries and bind export
>> libraries?
>
> The export versions of the libraries omit code that that's tightly-bound
> with named, and allow the use of application-supplied implementations for
> things like the memory and task and timer subsystems instead of the
> BIND-specific implementations.
>
>> Are they compatible with each other, in other words, will
>> dhcp work with BIND9 libraries(I find not)?
>
> No, they aren't compatible.  I really want to fix that someday.
>
>> What is the best way to have both BIND9 and dhcp?
>
> The best way right now is to link either BIND 9 or DHCP statically,
> or use a different library path for each one, so the conflicting libdns
> and libisc files don't step on each other.
>
> --
> Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
_______________________________________________
bind-workers mailing list
bind-workers@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-workers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]