[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bind-users
Subject:    Re: BIND question
From:       Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar () fantomas ! sk>
Date:       2018-04-12 16:11:06
Message-ID: 20180412161106.GD26250 () fantomas ! sk
[Download RAW message or body]

On 12.04.18 08:29, Mark Andrews wrote:
>The domain system provides such a feature using the canonical name
>(CNAME) RR.  A CNAME RR identifies its owner name as an alias, and
>specifies the corresponding canonical name in the RDATA section of the
>RR.  If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no other data should be
>present; this ensures that the data for a canonical name and its aliases
>cannot be different.  This rule also insures that a cached CNAME can be
>used without checking with an authoritative server for other RR types.
>
>Now go complain to the WC3 for not adding support for SRV to the protocol

you apparently mean W3C :-)

>or for defining a RR which points to a HTTP(S) server like MX points to
>a server for SMTP.

it was not apparently needed.
but maybe we would need defining RNAME that could recitect only one
given type of record, e.g.

@ IN RNAME A webhosting.example
   IN RNAME MX mailhosting.example


-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory. 
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]