[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bind-users
Subject:    Re: bind v9.3.1
From:       Stefan Puiu <stefan.puiu () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-08-30 13:10:02
Message-ID: 775f040105083006106efbc25a () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 8/30/05, Janardhan Molumuri <mjanardhan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >> You need to disable check-names for that zone
> Yes I can do that, But If the warning doesn't harm, then why bind is 
> logging it? Any idea why it meant for?
> 
You probably mean the condition causing the warning is not harmful, right? I 
think that statement depends on the particular user (e.g. some might be 
interested in enforcing these checks) , hence the possibility to set up the 
way check-names is enforced - if it prevents the zone from loading, only 
prints a warning or just ignores invalid names. 

I don't mean to be rude, but this has been discussed extensively when
9.3.0came out, and people with much better knowledge of the issue have
replied.
Check the archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bind-users, look for 
"check-names". Not to mention the fine documentation :).


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]