[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bind-users
Subject:    Re: Lame Server
From:       Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews () isc ! org>
Date:       2005-08-30 1:35:37
Message-ID: 200508300135.j7U1ZbBx066593 () drugs ! dv ! isc ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


> I have DNS working - or so I thought.   Now I have set up e-mail using my 
> own postfix MTA in a DMZ, I get the "Lame Server" error message on the IP 
> address of the firewall - which I would just as soon leave transparent. 
> Is that possible, or do I have to "name" the firewall ?
> 
> The error
> 
> Aug 29 16:40:47 xxxxx named[13215]: lame server resolving 
> '122.120.xx.xx.xx.in-addr.arpa' (in '120.xx.xx.xx.in-addr.arpa'?): 
> 168.143.168.1#53
> 
> Other Info:
> * It's a SuSE 9.2 box running BIND  9.2.4-3
> * SBC has given me a /29 block and I thought it was correct...
> * Internal machines are on a 192 subnet and a proxy-arp'd firewall (.122)
>   directs the traffic to the DMZ .123 address. 
> 
> Where do I look - or is it safe to post the entire "real" 
> configuration...just being paranoid.

	The error message indicates that 120.xx.xx.xx.in-addr.arpa
	has been delegated to 168.143.168.1 but it is not serving
	120.xx.xx.xx.in-addr.arpa.

	It would be much easier to tell you what to do if you hadn't
	tried to hide all the relevent details.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]