[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bind-users
Subject:    Re: bind 9 error
From:       Mark_Andrews () isc ! org
Date:       2003-05-29 23:47:38
[Download RAW message or body]


> Starting having the same problem with mci.com and a few others
> domains.  Forwarded DNS off the old server and more than half the
> messages in the queue delivered.
> 
> Is there any way to tell BIND 9 to not be so strict?  No one is going
> to care about the long run if the short run doesn't work.  Products
> should be backward compatible and as flexible as possible, but it
> seems BIND 9 is choosing the road of incompatible and strict.
	
	Why do you think that it should work with misconfigurations
	like below?  It's not like it is a new requirement that the
	glue in the parent has to match that in the child.

	Mark

Parent:
mci.com.                2D IN NS        dns1.wcom.com.
mci.com.                2D IN NS        dns2.wcom.com.

Child:
mci.com.                16M IN NS       dns1.mci.com.
mci.com.                16M IN NS       dns2.mci.com.


Parent:
wcom.com.               2D IN NS        dns1.wcom.com.
wcom.com.               2D IN NS        dns2.wcom.com.

Child:
wcom.com.               16M IN NS       omzdns.mcilink.com.
wcom.com.               16M IN NS       dns1.mci.com.
wcom.com.               16M IN NS       dns2.mci.com.
wcom.com.               16M IN NS       ndcdns.mcilink.com.


Parent:
mcilink.com.            2D IN NS        dns1.wcom.com.
mcilink.com.            2D IN NS        dns2.wcom.com.

Child:
mcilink.com.            16M IN NS       omzdns.mcilink.com.
mcilink.com.            16M IN NS       dns1.mci.com.
mcilink.com.            16M IN NS       dns2.mci.com.
mcilink.com.            16M IN NS       ndcdns.mcilink.com.

--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@isc.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]