[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       batik-dev
Subject:    Re: Proposed Change to build.sh
From:       Vincent Hardy <vhardy () eng ! sun ! com>
Date:       2001-04-27 15:42:49
[Download RAW message or body]

Thomas,

I am all for it! Would you mind doing the .bat at the same time, so 
that we get the same behavior in both. If you cannot test it, let me
know and I will do it.
Thanks.
V.

Thomas E Deweese wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
>    I was wondering if anyone would mind if I changed buid.sh to stick
> all args after the first one into the '-Dargs=...' flag for ant. Thus:
> 
> % build.sh svgbrowser samples/anne.svg samples/batikLogo.svg
> 
> would be the same as the current:
> 
> % build.sh svgbrowser -Dargs="samples/anne.svg samples/batikLogo.svg"
> 
> The only real downside to this is that you could no longer do:
> 
> % build.sh jars svgbrowers
> 
> You would have to run build.sh twice.  However since Ant doesn't seem
> to optimize this case any (like make does). There isn't much of an
> apparent win to doing both (I know I've never done it with ant before
> trying it out for this message, and I only very rarely do it with make).
> 
> Any opinions? If I don't ringing objections by end of day I'll commit
> the change.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic