[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       barracuda
Subject:    Re: [Barracuda] BarracudaMVC "src" directory updated (all  updated)....
From:       Shawn Wilson <shawnw () barracudamvc ! org>
Date:       2003-01-21 19:17:38
[Download RAW message or body]

Sounds good to me. Since the work has already been done and in fact it 
sounds like it wasn't that much, I say let's just leave it as it is. 
We'll still have the last b.e.org copy of the tree on the server (right 
now it's in a private location, but I can make it public if necessary) 
in case we ever need it. Of course, as time goes on the chances of us 
needing it (and in fact being able to use it) get very small.

Thanks Jake for cleaning up this mess.
-shawn

Christian Cryder wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>  
> I just pulled the latest from cvs and recompiled, and everything looks 
> fine on my end (it all compiled, unit tests ran successfully). I'm 
> inclined to prefer going with the approach you've taken of 
> diffing/repatching, rather than re-pulling the whole tree, mostly since 
> we've already made a fair amount of changes on the new system. The key, 
> of course, is just making sure we catch everything, but from the sounds 
> of it we have, and if there's something missing we could always go back 
> to the copy of the tree that Shawn pulled.
>  
> Christian
> ----------------------------------------------
> Christian Cryder [christianc@atmreports.com]
> Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
> Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org <http://barracudamvc.org/>
> ----------------------------------------------
> "Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* barracuda-admin@barracudamvc.org
>     [mailto:barracuda-admin@barracudamvc.org]*On Behalf Of *Jacob Kjome
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:46 AM
>     *To:* barracuda@barracudamvc.org
>     *Subject:* Re: [Barracuda] BarracudaMVC "src" directory updated (all
>     updated)....
> 
> 
>     Ok,
> 
>     As far as I can tell, everything that needed to be updated is
>     updated.  That includes every nook and cranny of the
>     barracudamvc.org Barracuda CVS module tree.
> 
>     Now, we could blow this away and just start over by going back and
>     starting fresh with the source from b.e.org.  The advantage of this
>     would be to keep all the history.  However, most of the recent
>     changes were code formatting ones and changing
>     "static logger" to "static final logger".  So, is it worth going
>     back a doing this?  It is arguable.  I'd say maybe not  What do
>     others think?
> 
>     Note that any major changes are recorded in A_Changes_History.java
>     so we still have that info.
> 
>     Jake
> 
>     At 12:06 AM 1/21/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> 
>>     Ok,
>>
>>     I think I have gotten everything upated on BarracudaMVC.org in
>>     comparison with b.e.org.  Note that I did take into account that
>>     some stuff had been updated on BarracudaMVC already.  As far as I
>>     know, no changes were lost.  If anyone wants to double check that
>>     I did everything properly, go ahead.  We can always use a second
>>     pair of eyes, but I think I got everything in the "src" directory
>>     updated.
>>
>>     I have done no such thing outside the "src" directory at this
>>     point.  So,  if someone wants to look at that, that would be good.
>>
>>     Thanks to Gwyn Evans for pointing out the tool "Beyond Compare". 
>>     It worked out nicely :-)
>>
>>     Jake
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Barracuda mailing list
>>     Barracuda@barracudamvc.org
>>     http://barracudamvc.org/lists/listinfo/barracuda


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]