[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bacula-users
Subject:    Re: [Bacula-users] two SD on a server
From:       Bill Arlofski <waa-bacula () revpol ! com>
Date:       2017-05-15 19:50:27
Message-ID: ab988712-e296-5675-338a-76ad12f0603c () revpol ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 05/15/2017 08:35 AM, Thomas Franz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in our opinion it is the best way to have one storage daemon for each
> storage device (more stable if one device ist lost etc.)
> Our configuration ( see below) works, but I have a problem with bconsole.
> In this configuration the status command of bconsole only shows the
> first storage !!!
> The second storage ist only shown if I change the "Address" , for
> example with the domain of a second network device ( Address =
> backup.seconddomain ).
> I don't understand this behavior and I don't like my hack .

Hi Thomas,

This is by design. If more than one Storage resource has the same "Address =" 
defined (ie: multiple storage resources on on SD), Bacula "rolls them up" and 
only shows the first one in selection lists.  Your "hack" is a valid way to 
have Bacula show them all.

In cases where I really want to see all of them (for testing, demonstrating, 
troubleshooting, etc), what I usually do is set up a different DNS A record 
for each Storage resource and just point them all to the same IP on the SD 
server.

Best regards,

Bill

-- 
Bill Arlofski
http://www.revpol.com/bacula
-- Not responsible for anything below this line --

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]