[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       backhand-users
Subject:    Re: [m_b_users] Compile question
From:       Theo Schlossnagle <jesus () omniti ! com>
Date:       2001-12-28 17:22:20
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday, December 28, 2001, at 12:18  PM, Matt C. wrote:
> Worked perfectly, thanks. I was under the (wrong?) impression that 
> apache dso
> support on Solaris was to be avoided as a general rule.

Well, I know for certain that compiling mod_backhand as a DSO and 
allowing it to load dynamic candidacy functions is a recipe for a seg 
fault under Solaris.  If there are other modules that suffer the same 
problems, I wouldn't feel so stupid...  So, that would be good :-)

I originally developed mod_backhand on a Linux 2.2 and a Solaris 2.6 
box.  On Solaris, dynamically loaded candidacy functions work fine if 
mod_backhand itself is compiled in statically.  I haven't witnessed (or 
been informed of) such limitations on other OSes.

--
Theo Schlossnagle
1024D/82844984/95FD 30F1 489E 4613 F22E  491A 7E88 364C 8284 4984
2047R/33131B65/71 F7 95 64 49 76 5D BA  3D 90 B9 9F BE 27 24 E7


_______________________________________________
backhand-users mailing list
backhand-users@lists.backhand.org
http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/backhand-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]